Nice early SC Signature

Started by Enzo, February 14, 2010, 10:20:05 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Enzo


keith_h

Way over priced Buy It Now.  
 
Keith

lembic76450

Unless he has case candy stating that it is Koa,
it really doesn't look it to me.  Possibly Walnut?

dannobasso


mike1762

I wonder how many of these went out the door with a Stanley sticker.  Is he claiming the body is Koa or the top/back?  The top/back look like cocobolo.  Maybe the $8,000 was metric dollars.

bsee

While I wouldn't stand up and say that's definitely koa, the pics are all on the dark side and the grain does look sort of koa like. I think it would take a more accurate picture or a wood card to tell the tale. Koa neck stringers would be pretty unusual, but who knows what sort of experiments they were doing with wood types back in '87.  
 
In any case, at $8K for a signature instrument, it almost wouldn't matter what the woods were in terms of value.

glocke

Definitely not Koa to my eyes either.  Its also priced about $4000.00 too much.

cozmik_cowboy

My guess is maple & purpleheart neck, mahagony core w/maple lams & rosewood top & back.  I don't see anything that remotely resembles koa.  
 
Peter
"Is not Hypnocracy no other than the aspiration to discover the meaning of Hypnocracy?  Have you heard the one about the yellow dog yet?"
St. Dilbert

"If I could explain it in prose, I wouldn't have had to write the song."
Robt. Hunter

jedisan

Yep, I say rosewood too. I had one of these from around the same build date. And I believe on these models, especially with the signature on the headstock, rosewood was the go to wood for front and back at the time.

to_81_0190

The discription is stating 'Body is Hawaiian Koa'. I have seen few Alembics with Koa center but I can't make it sure from pics. The top would be Indian Rosewood.